Other, solar

Draft norms for PV solar plants restrict capacity

According to reports, the Union ministry of new and renewable energy has come out with draft guidelines for setting up solar projects with a combined capacity of 750 mw with viability gap funding under batch I, phase II of the national solar mission.

The draft indicates that the maximum capacity a developer can set up is 100 mw. A tariff for power purchase at Rs 5.45 per kwh fixed for 25 years has been suggested. A fixed tariff of Rs 4.95 per kwh will be awarded to projects availing accelerated depreciation.

Other suggestions include gap funding up to 30 per cent of the project cost, or Rs 2.5 crore per mw, whichever is less. Also, developers’ equity contribution should be at least Rs 1.5 crore per mw. The balance amount can be raised as loan from any source.

A project should have a minimum capacity of 10 mw if based on solar photovoltaic concept where the maximum capacity will be 50 mw.

However, the total capacity of solar PV projects to be allocated to a group, its mother company, affiliate or any of its companies will be 100 mw. A group of any part of it may submit applications for a maximum of three projects at different locations – but these projects together cannot have a capacity over 100 mw.

The allocation, signing of power purchase agreements and handing out of gap funding will all be handled by the Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI).

Reacting, renewable energy consultancy firm Bridge to India, said: “A key concern with regard gap funding is its impact on the long- term performance of projects and the scope for developers to execute low- quality projects for short- term gains. The ministry of new and renewable energy has provided some safeguards to prevent this.

It said, “As per the draft guidelines, it has been decided that a handout of the gap funding will take place in three instalments. The first instalment of 25 per cent will be handed out after the delivery of at least 50 per cent of equipment, 50 per cent on the successful commissioning of a project and the remaining 25 per cent thereafter.”

The draft says that if a plant fails to generate power continuously for one year during the course of the PPA or the project is dismantled or its assets sold, SECI will have the right to claim assets equal to the value of the gap funding granted. “However, no real safeguards have been provided to ensure the quality of production,” said Bridge to India.

In the current scenario, developers will impart greater focus on reducing capex rather than on optimising plant performance. For example, a developer could buy the cheapest equipment and reduce plant capex to Rs 6 crore per mw with an equity investment of Rs 1.8 crore per mw. On this, the developer could avail tax benefits, based on accelerated depreciation, up to Rs 1.58 crore per mw, and, as an example, is able to avail of Rs 2 crore per mw as gap funding.

In such a scenario, the developer would have received back almost 60 per cent of the project investment and almost 200 per cent of the equity investment within one year. This will leave very little incentive for him to stay invested in a project with a PPA price of just Rs 4.95/kwh.

This not only has the potential to derail the policy motives but will also put lenders in doubt about the developer’s intentions.

Another key concern is the location of projects. No clarity has yet been provided on which states will be willing to buy solar power at those prices, the consultancy said.

The ministry has asked for suggestions and comments on the draft by April 30 before it finalises the guidelines.


One thought on “Draft norms for PV solar plants restrict capacity

  1. In the west the selling of the projects is rampant (Topi pahenane ka attitude), by irrelevant and politically backed parties or institutionally funded or (read as asset management company promoted) developed companies will look for early exit, without caring for sustainability or the COUNTRY or its asset…

    Promoters and FIs want to exit rather than serving the nation !! This is the reason huge debt is not paid due to such poor quality technology or equipment or poor promoter intent….. Many renewable energy companies are waiting to for public listing with poor quality assets including wind, solar pv, solar thermal, biomass etc…. again Topi pahenao to the gullible retail investors with such hidden exit plans……… i hope stock market will loose its sheen in the days to come and the poor performance of many such IPO listed companies is already under scanner and the share price and the quality of people who are managing the business is also known, otherwise, why such FAR below issue price stock trading as seen today…??

    It would be foolish to accept that our intellectual class such as IAS or UPSC institute is so poor in policy making, but, many a time, many such intentionally (or lobbied) ill drafted policies have seen the light including the Nuclear Deal or Biomass power projects or MSW projects…… Unless, the transparency with financial numbers becomes part of policy document, to demonstrate as to how common man’s and Country’s interest is taken care, these kinds of intentional wrong policy drafts will be put to the people to rectify.

    If Common Man or Country’s interest is not addressed at the first place, if many of us have to point out serious deficiencies, then, what are the responsibilities of these policy makers?? Why Immunity through Constitution to such class?

    The apparent errors seen in the policy making should question the credibility of the institutions and their competence, otherwise, the hard fought independence will be lost along with Economic sovereignty. This is the serious threat to the Democracy and the democratic norms.

    In case of failure to deliver the performance, people are only concentrating on the VGF amount recovery, but, what about the debt recovery..? Many Biomass plants are not functioning, did anyone recover??….again tribunals and loss to the nation as we have already 40 Billion USD of debt is not paid by many such promoters / companies and again keep making policy only for small money recovery and not for the entire amount??

    Posted by praveen Kulkarni | April 23, 2013, 10:43 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Panchabuta's Trending Tweets

Panchabuta’s Twitter

Web Analytics Clicky
stats for wordpress
%d bloggers like this: